flickralt

Looking for a Flickr Alternative

Introduction

On TWiP Episode #239, one of the topics of discussion was the newest layoffs at Yahoo!, specifically of senior Flickr support staff. The layoffs, which apparently eliminated some of Flickr’s most dedicated fans within the company, are just another indication of the low priority Yahoo! has assigned to Flickr.

As a result, photographers are looking for alternatives to Flickr, just in case Yahoo! decides to shut down the service – or if the service doesn’t keep up with photographers’ needs. Fortunately, there are a number of alternatives to Flickr (too many to list in one article), both paid and free. In this article, I take a look at my top free alternatives to Flickr.

Google+

The Google+ Creative Kit

The Google+ Creative Kit

Of all the social networks out there, Google+ is easily the best suited for photographers. First, if you follow the work of any professional photographers, they’re pretty likely to be on Google+. Second, the engineers behind Google+ seem to have a special affinity for photographers.

The thumbnails for images attached to posts, for example, are nice and large, and the “lightbox” that the images display in when you click on them to see a larger version allow you to also see things like the photo’s metadata, comments from other people, and even a histogram, if you’re so inclined.

Basic organization tools like albums are also available, and uploading photos is drop-dead easy. iPhone and Android users can also upload images directly from their devices (though I wish there was a dedicated iPad app, you can use the iPhone app on the iPad).

Google bought online photo editing service Picnik back in 2010, and some of its features are making their way into Google+. When you upload a photo, Google+ lets you use its “Creative Kit” to adjust things like exposure, sharpness, and rotation. It goes beyond that, allowing for vintage effects like Daguerreotype and Polaroid to be applied to photos as well.

Bottom-line: Google+ offers a good, robust solution for those looking to share their photos in a more “social” setting.

500px.com

The Editor's Picks at 500px.com

The Editor's Choice Section at 500px.com

“Big” is the order of the day at 500px. Images are displayed at a fairly large size, taking up much of your screen real estate. That’s not to say that it’s just a fancy slideshow-style website, however. 500px has a lot of functionality that’s carefully laid out with your photos taking center-stage.

This service is all about putting your best foot forward. They ask that you upload your best work to your account, and while there may be a few folks who don’t adhere to this standard, most do. One look at the Editor’s Choice images and you can see right away that the users of 500px do indeed care about maintaining a high standard on the site.

500px is regularly mentioned by pros like Scott Kelby and RC Concepcion, who often reference it for inspiration.

The service is still growing, so not all the “social” features of Flickr have made it over to 500px just yet. You can comment and rate photos, create a blog, follow your friends, and even maintain a Facebook-esque “Wall”. Groups, forums, a Flickr importer and more features are in the works, but the service is a photographer-favorite, and with good reason.

DeviantArt

DeviantArt Photography Section

DeviantArt Photography Section

In TWiP #238, Frederick Van Johnson interviewed Josh Wattles, the Advisor-in-Chief from DeviantArt. While this site has been on my personal radar as an awesome design resource since my graphic design days, it was kind of a “Duh!” moment for me when I realized that there are a lot of photographers who also use DeviantArt.

In fact, according to Josh Wattles, 31% of uploads to DeviantArt are in the photography category, and more than 1.7 million of DeviantArt’s members are photographers. There are also over 3000 photography-related groups and forums on the site.

What makes DeviantArt a fascinating choice for photographers is the cross-disciplinary nature of the service. From film and animation, to literature, graphic design, and traditional art, DeviantArt is home to artists of multiple genres working in many different mediums. And, while it’s true that to become a better photographer, you have to look at the work of other photographers, that also holds true for looking at art created in other forms as well. DeviantArt is an ideal place to do this, and to collaborate with other artists too.

1x.com

1x.com's Featured Photographer Section

1x.com's Featured Photographer Section

1x.com is pretty close to an online museum or gallery for photography. The look and feel of the site reflect this – lots of white space, an elegant layout, and a great deal of focus on the image are the hallmarks of 1x.com’s aesthetic.

The site boasts a very active set of forums on photography, as well as a really cool Critique feature. Here, photographers can post images they would like critiques on, and as opposed to the one-liners that you normally see in the comments attached to photos on most sharing sites, the feedback posted on images in this section are usually a couple of paragraphs long and are pretty well thought-out. It’s a great feature that more sites ought to adopt.

The site’s editors drive traffic to the best images, which are curated carefully. They also offer a lot of tools for members to sell their images as canvas or framed prints. 1x.com has also managed to get gallery managers, editors, authors and art directors buying from them.

Conclusion

Those are my picks for free alternatives to Flickr. Like Flickr, all of the above services, except for Google+, have “pro” accounts that add functionality, space, or other features for a fee. Of course, there are a lot more alternatives to Flickr; as I said at the start of this article, there’s too many to mention here. If you’ve got one that you’d like to tell us about, leave us a comment.

In Part 2, I’ll take a look at paid-only services like SmugMug, Zenfolio and PhotoShelter. If you have a suggestion for something we should take a look at, let us know in the comments below.

About Sohail Mamdani

Sohail Mamdani is a writer and photographer based in the San Francisco Bay Area.
  • http://twitter.com/cumuluslight Gregg Le Blanc

    You might want to add RedBubble.com (which is nearly a carbon copy of Flickr in some good and bad ways, but adds commerce – and the products are good quality, but their cut is steep). And TWiP has talked about PurePhoto before, so putting them in could be good too.

    I sometimes use Microsoft’s SkyDrive with its new HTML5 slideshow / folders to deliver bulk sets of images to clients easily. They now have apps on all the major mobile devices and Windows Phone 7 syncs directly to SkyDrive. Windows Live Photo Gallery will upload / sync directly there too.

    Photographers in general should investigate “Windows Live Custom Domains” at domains.live.com to get email (via Hotmail’s interface / services), SkyDrive, and Calendar support for their business. It works great on your iPhone / Android / Windows Phone 7 and will give you 25GB of space to place images for clients to grab easily.

    And of course, I almost always use Facebook for clients to review proofs because Like / Comments are easy to track.

  • Anonymous

    I am also keeping an eye on http://theopenphotoproject.org/  Store your pictures on dropbox or Amazon S3

  • Anonymous

    In order to be an effective Flickr replacement, the site must offer the ability to organize albums into collections and subcollections, which none of the above do. And you must be able to dump all your snapshots there, which 500px discourages (thankfully)–not sure about the 1x thing.

    The community offered by Flickr would be nice, too–Google+ doesn’t offer quite the same experience as the Flickr Groups and forums.

    • Sohail Mamdani

      I agree with the lack of groups and forums being an issue – though 500px does have those two in the works. I guess I should have been a tad clearer about the fact that this piece was geared more towards photographers looking for somewhere to post their work, rather than for most people looking for an online storage/showcase for snapshots. 

  • http://twitter.com/PeterKremzar Peter Kremzar

    Well. There is still no serious replacement for Flickr no matter what you guys at Twip and some others are trying to present to your listeners. For my opinion Flickr still offers so many services, simple UI and quality of photographs that none G+ or FB can come close. But I agree that FB and G+ each have some advantages comparing to Flickr.

    For my opinion the whole campaign against Flickr started because some of the people that work in the photography field didn’t get the recognition at Flickr that they would like to have. Some of them have very few views of their photos on Flickr. But you really have to work for that or you have to be real good as everywhere else. Some of these guys – like Trey Ratcliff for example – saw the opportunity to get the recognition they wanted in the newly established G+. It was easier to become more recognized there because they were there from the beginning. This is my point of view about all this Flickr “problems”.

    • Sohail Mamdani

      With due respect, Peter, I disagree with your proposition that the “whole campaign against Flickr started because some of the people that work in the photography field didn’t get the recognition at Flickr that they would like to have.”

      I don’t think that’s true at all. Flickr hasn’t moved forward much in the last few years. The team that worked on it has been diminishing, the basic design and featureset haven’t changed in some time, and now, some of the strongest advocates for Flickr inside the company have been let go. That’s why people are wondering about its future. Let’s not forget that Flickr’s owner, Yahoo!, is currently disgruntled.

      Again, due respect, but I think it’s pretty cynical to imply that folks moved off Flickr because they couldn’t get recognition there. Mentioning Trey Ratcliff as one of those people further weakens your argument; Trey could make it on any site he darn well choses. He’s on Google+ because he, like all the other photographers there, believe that the service actually has something worthwhile to offer. It’s laughable to suggest that Trey couldn’t get the recognition he wanted on Flickr. 

      Bottom-line: Flickr has issues. Photographers are moving off Flickr because there are better alternatives. I’m not posting my images there because I don’t think Flickr shows them off in the best way possible. For me, Google+ and 500px are better alternatives. If you like Flickr, however, kudos to you; no one is telling you that you have to move. Flickr still has value – I still visit the forums there. But to cast aspersions on someone’s motive because they’re doing something you don’t agree with is kinda disingenuous, IMHO.

  • http://www.markrakocy.com/ mrakocy

    Good article, looking forward to part 2.

    By the way, your link for 1x.com up above goes to ix.com with nothing there.

    • Sohail Mamdani

      Hi mrakocy,

      Fixed, thanks!

  • http://www.iashihara.com Ichiro Ashihara

    I also hope Flickr survives. It works well for me and I like having it simple and separate from FB, Google+..etc also unlimited full res storage is very nice.  Its still getting 5000+ new photos per minute. Of course quantity is not everything but it shows there is still interest.